💻
Desktop Recommended

This website is NOT designed for mobile use;
it is best viewed on a laptop.

We'd appreciate your feedback
Published article page hero background animation

Digital Sovereignty and Data Protection in the 21st Century.

Subtitle

A Comparative Study of Regulatory Frameworks in the European Union and the United States.

Abstract

Focus on the "Why" and "What." This research examines the divergent approaches to data privacy between the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the sector-specific regulatory environment of the US. By comparing legislative intent, enforcement mechanisms, and the definition of "privacy as a right" versus "privacy as a consumer interest," this study highlights the geopolitical implications of digital governance.

Introduction

    1. Context: The rise of the "Surveillance Economy" and the necessity of state intervention.
    2. Problem Statement: While both regions value privacy, their legal philosophies differ fundamentally, leading to international trade friction and varying levels of citizen protection.
    3. Argument: The EU’s "rights-based" approach creates a global gold standard (The Brussels Effect), whereas the US "market-based" approach prioritizes innovation but results in a fragmented legal landscape.

  • StatePopulationm/f ratio
    Odisha100000045%
    Asam20000035%

    Research Ques & Method

    Research Questions: 1. How do the legal definitions of "personal data" differ between the EU and the US? 2. To what extent does the GDPR influence American state-level legislation (e.g., California’s CCPA)?
  • Methodology: This study employs a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), reviewing primary legal texts, judicial rulings (such as the Schrems II case), and policy reports from 2018 to 2024.

  • databricks.jpeg
    Figure 1

    Results & Discussion

    FeatureEuropean Union (GDPR)United States
    Philosophical BasePrivacy as a Fundamental Human Right.Privacy as a Contractual/Consumer Right.
    Regulation StyleComprehensive/Omnibus.Sectoral (HIPAA, GLBA, etc.).
    ConsentOpt-in (Explicit).Opt-out (Implicit/Varies).
    EnforcementData Protection Authorities (DPAs).Federal Trade Commission (FTC) & State AGs.

    References

    Word Limit: Keep your eye on that 10,000-word limit mentioned in your sidebar. References: Use APA 7th Edition for Political Science, as it is the standard for tracking policy citations and journals. Originality: Don't forget to check that box at the bo
    Review Icon

    Post Publication Open Review

    1 star "Very Poor" and 5 stars "Excellent"
    Rate Here

    No comments yet.

    We are inclusive, affordable, and open for all students looking to make their mark in the research community. Don't wait, take the leap into publishing your work with us!